Use case 04 · Repeat failures

A bad actor pump that keeps eating mechanical seals

Each failure was repaired like-for-like and closed. The sister pump P-111, with the same seal, lasts three times longer. Valqor compared the operating history before each failure.

Illustrative example based on a common failure pattern
Equipment
P-110 transfer pump, single mechanical seal
Symptom
Five seal failures in 24 months, run life falling from 212 to 74 days
Data used
Historian: 7 tags over 24 months · 5 seal failure work orders · Alarm log · Shift logs
01 · The pattern

What the data shows

The pump spends long periods well below its minimum continuous flow of 20 m³/h. Seal flush temperature jumps by 20 °C during those periods, and the hours spent there rose before each failure.

P-110 flow and seal flush temperature, 30 days before the fifth failurePump flow (m³/h)Seal flush temperature (°C)Seal failure
0.04023634585Aug 12Aug 18Aug 24Aug 30Sep 5Sep 11Minimum continuous flow 20 m³/h

Three long runs below minimum flow, each with a jump in flush temperature.

Seal run life before each failure
  • Seal 1212 days
  • Seal 2141 days
  • Seal 3118 days
  • Seal 496 days
  • Seal 574 days
Hours below minimum flow, 30 days before each failure
  • Seal 16 hours
  • Seal 222 hours
  • Seal 331 hours
  • Seal 447 hours
  • Seal 563 hours
02 · The sequence

Before the fifth failure, Sep 2026

Historian readings, alarms, operator notes and work orders, lined up on one timeline.

  1. Operator log“Downstream unit on reduced rate. P-110 throttled back.”
  2. HistorianFlow below 20 m³/h for 16 hours. Flush temperature 74 °C.
  3. Work orderWO-7031: min-flow bypass FV-110 found in manual, closed. Returned to auto.
  4. HistorianAnother 14 hours below minimum flow.
  5. AlarmSeal pot high pressure alarm on P-110.
  6. Work orderWO-7058: seal leaking, pump isolated. Fifth seal replacement.
03 · The causes

Likely causes, tested against the evidence

Each candidate cause is checked against the records, with the evidence for and against it shown side by side.

Running below minimum continuous flow

Supported

Evidence forLow-flow hours rose before every failure as seal life fell. The min-flow bypass was found closed in manual on three of the five work orders.

Evidence againstNone found in the available records.

Seal flush plan not suited to the duty

Possible

Evidence forFlush temperature spikes during low-flow periods.

Evidence againstThe spikes only happen at low flow, so they look like a consequence, not a separate cause.

Wrong seal type or material

Weak

Evidence forNone beyond the repeat failures.

Evidence againstThe sister pump P-111 uses the same seal and lasts about three times as long.

04 · The outcome

Finding and recommended actions

An engineer reviews the finding and the linked records before any action is taken.

The seals are failing because P-110 spends more and more time below its minimum flow, mostly when the downstream unit runs at reduced rate and the min-flow bypass has been left in manual.

  • Keep the min-flow bypass FV-110 in automatic and alarm when it is switched to manual.
  • Add a low-flow alarm at 20 m³/h with a time delay.
  • Agree the pump’s operating envelope at reduced rates with operations, and track seal life after the change.
More use cases

Have an equipment problem that keeps coming back?

Tell us about it. We’ll show you how Valqor would investigate it.

Book a demo